Spread Strategies

Introduction

Introduction

  • AiLA strategies often comprises outright futures assets with opportunistic allocations targeting certain risk/reward objectives.
  • AiLA strategies can, however, also accommodate futures spreads, where the spreads are treated as an asset following some common definitions.
  • Note: the examples and results here only address intra-commodity spreads, where other types will be discussed in future decks.

Spread Definition

  • The AiLA methodology treat spreads as a single asset, with an associated allocation weight (w).
  • For an intra-commodity spread the allocation weight is used to calculate the position based on the leg with highest (USD) price.
  • Both legs in the spread are then assigned the same positions in terms of number of contracts.

e.g.

WTI calendar spread M24 [82.82 $/bbl] vs Z24 [77.89 $/bbl],
with AUM = 100M and w = 1%,
would corresponds to12 lots M24 long and 12 lots Z24 short,
based on maximum price leg M24.

Spread Return and Notional

Portfolio

Spread Caps:

  • Different position and trade constraints from outright portfolios.
  • Max sum(|w|) < 200%
  • Max spread weight < 50%
  • Spread specific weight (liquidity) caps.

Typically, larger asset weights than outright portfolios to achieve reasonable risk, given smaller spread returns.

Performance

Spread Portfolio:

  • Max drawdown (peak-to-trough): -4.8%
  • Nr month: 62 (pos) 27 (neg) 69% (% pos)
  • Return Statistics
Statistic Day Week Month Quarter
Avg Return -- 0.2% 0.9% 2.7%
STD Return 0.4% 0.7% 1.7% 3.2%
Max Loss -2.1% -2.1% -4.3% -4.2%

Outright portfolio:(similar set of commodities)

  • Correlation: 23% (D), 32% (W), 36% (M), 54% (Q).
  • Max diversification at about 50/50 strategy weights, when operated at their individual risk levels.
  • Indicate a noticeable diversification benefit, despite slightly positive correlation.

Conclusions

  • In this deck the method to include spreads in an AiLA strategy is described, and the results from a commodity spread portfolio was compared to a similar outright futures assets portfolio.
  • The smaller spread returns requires an increased spread asset weight than for out right portfolios, however, a relevant portfolio risk still appears to be achievable.
  • The performance of the spread portfolio is shown to be comparable to the outright portfolio over the same history, and indicate a noticeable diversification benefit, despite a slightly positive correlation.
  • The current deck only address the AiLA method used for intra-commodity spreads, where other spread types will be addressed in future decks.

In average, results suggest that exit at close on T+1 is as good or slightly beneficial with respect to earlier exit options, both when exit triggered by a stoploss as well as a target.

Appendix

Portfolio Constituents

  • Aluminum Month 1 vs Month 3 Spread
  • Soybean July vs November Spread
  • Soybeans Front November vs Deferred November Spread
  • Soybean Oil July vs December Spread
  • Brent June vs December Spread
  • Brent Front December vs Deferred December spread
  • Copper Month 1 vs Month 3 Spread
  • Corn July vs December Spread
  • Corn Front December vs Deferred December Spread
  • Cotton July vs December Spread
  • Gas Oil June vs December Spread
  • Gold Month 1 vs Month 3 Spread
  • Heating Oil June vs December Spread
  • Arabica Coffee July vs December Spread
  • Kansas Wheat July vs December Spread
  • Live Cattle Month 1 vs Month 3 Spread
  • Lead Month 1 vs Month 3 Spread
  • Lean Hogs July vs December Spread
  • Soy Meal July vs December Spread
  • Natural Gas June vs December Spread
  • Natural Gas Front December vs Deferred December Spread
  • Nickel Month 1 vs Month 3 Spread
  • RBOB March vs June Spread
  • Silver Month 1 vs Month 3 Spread
  • Sugar July vs October Spread
  • Sugar October vs March Spread
  • Wheat July vs December Spread
  • WTI June vs December Spread
  • WTI Front December vs Deferred December Spread
  • Zinc Month 1 vs Month 3 Spread